When working on a Rails project, you may have seen present? calls on
ActiveRecord relationships. This might feel natural, mostly because present?
exists on all objects via ActiveSupport, so you expect the relationship to respond to it,
but it’s actually not a very good idea. If all we want to do is check if the
scope returns any results from the database, there are better ways than using
present?.
A few weeks ago, I noticed weird output in the RSpec test suite (~4000 tests) for a Rails application:
.............................................................................................unknown OID 353414: failed to recognize type of '<field>'. It will be treated as String ...........................................................................................................................................
This Rails app uses a PostgreSQL database. After some Googling, it turns out that this is a warning from PostgreSQL. When the database doesn’t recognize the type to use for a column, it casts to string by default.
Read moreRails is a powerful framework. You can write a lot of features in a short period of time. In the process you can easily write code that performs poorly.
At OmbuLabs we like to maintain Ruby on Rails applications. In the process of maintaining them, adding features and fixing bugs, we like to improve the code and its performance (because we are good boy scouts!)
Here are some tips based on our experience.
Prefer where instead of select
When you are performing a lot of calculations, you should load as little as possible into memory. Always prefer a SQL query vs. an object’s method call.
Read moreWhen writing tests for services, you may sometimes want to use mock objects instead of real objects. In case you’re using ActiveRecord and real objects, your tests may hit the database and slow down your suite. The latest release of the rspec-mocks library bundled with RSpec 3 includes at least three different ways to implement a mock object.
Let’s discuss some of the differences between a spy, a double and an
instance_double. First, the spy:
[1] pry(main)> require 'rspec/mocks/standalone'
=> true
[2] pry(main)> user_spy = spy(User)
=> #<Double User>
[3] pry(main)> spy.whatever_method
=> #<Double (anonymous)>
There are already quite a few guides in the wild to help with the upgrade of Rails 3.2 to Rails 4.0.
The official Rails guide for upgrading from Rails 3.2 to 4.0 is very thorough. With the recent release of Rails 5.0, apps currently in production running Rails 3.2 should probably be updated to any stable Rails 4 release as soon as possible.
There is even an e-book about upgrading from Rails 3 to 4, which serves as a useful guide to make this upgrade easier, and also helps understand the advantages & disadvantages of this new (soon to be old) version.
However, if you’re using any non-standard gems, you’re mostly on your own. Some gems stopped being maintained before Rails 4 was released, as was the case with CanCan, a well known authorization library. After many open pull requests were left unmerged, CanCanCan was released. It is a community driven effort to have a semi-official fork of CanCan. It serves as a drop-in replacement for people who want to use CanCan after upgrading to Rails 4.
Read more